top of page
AdobeStock_352149697.jpeg

A Case Study Examining the Effectiveness of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy in a Patient who Met the Clinical Prediction Rule for Spinal Manipulation

Cite

Full Text Link

Review

-

Structural and chiropractic

J Man Manip Ther.2009;17(4):216-20.

Authors:

J Chen, A Phillips, M Ramsey, R Schenk

Abstract.

This single-subject case study was conducted as a part of a randomized trial investigating the efficacy of mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MDT) and spinal thrust manipulation (STM) in patients who meet a clinical prediction rule (CPR) for spinal manipulation. Following initial examination, a patient who met the CPR was treated initially with STM and then eventually with MDT. The Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI), Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, and the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) were administered at the initial examination and at a two-week follow-up. Data were analyzed based on changes in the pain rating scale, ODI, and straight leg raise scores from initial examination to discharge. In accordance with a study protocol in which the patient was part of, this patient was changed from STM to MDT after the second physical therapy visit due to failure of overall improvement. The patient received MDT during the third session and continued with this approach until discharge. This patient responded favorably to MDT presenting with a 20 degrees improvement in SLR on the left and 10 degrees on the right, 6 points lower on the NPRS, and a 4% decrease on the OSW after a total of 6 visits.

Publication Date: 

2009 Aug

OEID: 

5123

Chen, J., Phillips, A., Ramsey, M., Schenk, R. (2009) 'A Case Study Examining the Effectiveness of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy in a Patient who Met the Clinical Prediction Rule for Spinal Manipulation', J Man Manip Ther.2009;17(4):216-20.

Sponsored by 

logo-footer-k.png

Search    Explore    About    Join    Web Policy     Contact Us

Copyright © 2023 OsteoEvidence. All Rights Reserved.
 

bottom of page