top of page
AdobeStock_352149697.jpeg

A degree of difference: the origins of osteopathy and first use of the "DO" designation

Cite

Full Text Link

Books and documents

-

Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment

J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014 Jan;114(1):30-40.

Authors:

Norman Gevitz

Abstract.

This article is the first installment in a series of 6 articles on the history of and controversies related to the DO degree. Four questions about the origins of osteopathy and the initial use of the DO designation will be addressed in this particular article. First, did Andrew Taylor Still earn an MD diploma?--he being invariably described as an MD in current osteopathic periodical literature. Second, what was the importance of "magnetic healing" in the evolution of Still's thought? Third, how did the principles and practice of "bonesetting" complete his new system? Finally, when did he originate the term osteopathy and first devise and employ the DO designation? Future articles will examine episodically the history of the DO degree from Still's establishment of the American School of Osteopathy in 1892 up through to the present debate over its significance and value.

Publication Date: 

2014 Jan

OEID: 

2485

Gevitz, N. (2014) 'A degree of difference: the origins of osteopathy and first use of the "DO" designation ', J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014 Jan;114(1):30-40.

Sponsored by 

logo-footer-k.png

Search    Explore    About    Join    Web Policy     Contact Us

Copyright © 2023 OsteoEvidence. All Rights Reserved.
 

bottom of page