top of page
AdobeStock_352149697.jpeg

A perspective for considering the risks and benefits of spinal manipulation in patients with low back pain

Cite

Full Text Link

Review

-

Structural and chiropractic

Man Ther.2006 Nov;11(4):316-20.

Authors:

J D Childs, T W Flynn, J M Fritz

Abstract.

The purpose of this study was to determine if patients who do not receive manipulation for their low back pain (LBP) are at an increased risk for worsening disability compared to patients receiving an exercise intervention without manipulation. One hundred and thirty-one consecutive patients with LBP were randomly assigned to receive manipulation and an exercise intervention (n = 70) or an exercise intervention without manipulation (n = 61). Patients were classified as to whether they had experienced a worsening in disability upon follow-up. Relative risk and number needed to treat (NNT) statistics and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Patients who completed the exercise intervention without manipulation were eight (95% CI: 1.1, 63.5) times more likely to experience a worsening in disability than patients who received manipulation. The NNT with manipulation to prevent one additional patient from experiencing a worsening in disability was 9.9 (95% CI: 4.9, 65.3) and 4 weeks with manipulation was 11.6 (95% CI: 5.2, 219.2). The results of this study offer an additional perspective for considering the risks and benefits of spinal manipulation and help to inform the integration of current evidence for spinal manipulation into healthcare policy.

Publication Date: 

2006 Nov

OEID: 

4882

Childs, DJ., Flynn, WT., Fritz, MJ. (2006) 'A perspective for considering the risks and benefits of spinal manipulation in patients with low back pain', Man Ther.2006 Nov;11(4):316-20.

Sponsored by 

logo-footer-k.png

Search    Explore    About    Join    Web Policy     Contact Us

Copyright © 2023 OsteoEvidence. All Rights Reserved.
 

bottom of page