top of page
AdobeStock_352149697.jpeg

A randomized control trial to determine the effectiveness and physiological effects of spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization compared to each other and a sham condition in patients with chronic low back pain: Study protocol for The RELIEF Study

Cite

Full Text Link

Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical trial

-

Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment,Structural and chiropractic

Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Jul;70:41-52.doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.05.012.

Authors:

Brian C Clark, David W Russ, Masato Nakazawa, Christopher R France, Stevan Walkowski, Timothy D Law, Megan Applegate, Niladri Mahato, Samuel Lietkam, James Odenthal, Daniel Corcos, Simeon Hain, Betty Sindelar, Robert J Ploutz-Snyder, James S Thomas

Abstract.



Background: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common reasons for seeking medical care. Manipulative therapies are a common treatment for LBP. Few studies have compared the effectiveness of different types of manipulative therapies. Moreover, the physiologic mechanisms underlying these treatments are not fully understood. Herein, we present the study protocol for The Researching the Effectiveness of Lumbar Interventions for Enhancing Function Study (The RELIEF Study).

Methods and study design: The RELIEF Study is a Phase II RCT with a nested mechanistic design. It is a single-blinded, sham-controlled study to test the mechanisms and effectiveness of two manual therapy techniques applied to individuals (n = 162; 18-45 years of age) with chronic LBP. The clinical outcome data from the mechanistic component will be pooled across experiments to permit an exploratory Phase II RCT investigating the effectiveness. Participants will be randomized into one of three separate experiments that constitute the mechanistic component to determine the muscular, spinal, and cortical effects of manual therapies. Within each of these experimental groups study participants will be randomly assigned to one of the three treatment arms: 1) spinal manipulation, 2) spinal mobilization, or 3) sham laser therapy. Treatments will be delivered twice per week for 3-weeks.

Discussion: This data from this will shed light on the mechanisms underlying popular treatments for LBP. Additionally, the coupling of this basic science work in the context of a clinical trial will also permit examination of the clinical efficacy of two different types of manipulative therapies.

Publication Date: 

2018 Jul

OEID: 

3056

Clark, CB., Russ, WD., Nakazawa, M., France, RC., Walkowski, S., Law, DT., Applegate, M., Mahato, N., Lietkam, S., Odenthal, J., Corcos, D., Hain, S., Sindelar, B., Ploutz-snyder, JR., Thomas, SJ. (2018) 'A randomized control trial to determine the effectiveness and physiological effects of spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization compared to each other and a sham condition in patients with chronic low back pain: Study protocol for The RELIEF Study ', Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Jul;70:41-52.doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.05.012.

Sponsored by 

logo-footer-k.png

Search    Explore    About    Join    Web Policy     Contact Us

Copyright © 2023 OsteoEvidence. All Rights Reserved.
 

bottom of page