top of page
AdobeStock_352149697.jpeg

Biomechanical and neurophysiological responses to spinal manipulation in patients with lumbar radiculopathy

Cite

Full Text Link

Review

-

Structural and chiropractic

J Manipulative Physiol Ther.2004 Jan;27(1):1-15.

Authors:

C J Colloca, T S Keller, R Gunzburg

Abstract.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to quantify in vivo vertebral motions and neurophysiological responses during spinal manipulation. Methods: Nine patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery participated in this study. Spinal manipulative thrusts (SMTs) ( approximately 5 ms; 30 N [Sham], 88 N, 117 N, and 150 N [max]) were administered to lumbar spine facet joints (FJs) and spinous processes (SPs) adjacent to an intraosseous pin with an attached triaxial accelerometer and bipolar electrodes cradled around the S1 spinal nerve roots. Peak baseline amplitude compound action potential (CAP) response and peak-peak amplitude axial (AX), posterior-anterior (PA), and medial-lateral (ML) acceleration time and displacement time responses were computed for each SMT. Within-subject statistical analyses of the effects of contact point and force magnitude on vertebral displacements and CAP responses were performed. Results: SMTs (>/= 88 N) resulted in significantly greater peak-to-peak ML, PA, and AX vertebral displacements compared with sham thrusts (P <.002). SMTs delivered to the FJs resulted in approximately 3-fold greater ML motions compared with SPs (P <.001). SMTs over the SPs resulted in significantly greater AX displacements compared with SMTs applied to the FJs (P <.05). Seventy-five percent of SMTs resulted in positive CAP responses with a mean latency of 12.0 ms. Collectively, the magnitude of the CAP responses was significantly greater for max setting SMTs compared with sham (P <.01). Conclusions: Impulsive SMTs in human subjects were found to stimulate spinal nerve root responses that were temporally related to the onset of vertebral motion. Further work, including examination of the frequency and force duration dependency of SMT, is necessary to elucidate the clinical relevance of enhanced or absent CAP responses in patients.

Publication Date: 

2004 Jan

OEID: 

4705

Colloca, JC., Keller, ST., Gunzburg, R. (2004) 'Biomechanical and neurophysiological responses to spinal manipulation in patients with lumbar radiculopathy', J Manipulative Physiol Ther.2004 Jan;27(1):1-15.

Sponsored by 

logo-footer-k.png

Search    Explore    About    Join    Web Policy     Contact Us

Copyright © 2023 OsteoEvidence. All Rights Reserved.
 

bottom of page