top of page
AdobeStock_352149697.jpeg

Complementary and alternative medicine for labor pain: a systematic review

Cite

Full Text Link

Sistematic Review

-

Visceral and pregnancy

Am J Obstet Gynecol.2004 Jul;191(1):36-44.

Authors:

A L Huntley, J T Coon, E Ernst

Abstract.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature for, and critically appraise, randomized controlled trials of any type of complementary and alternative therapies for labor pain. Study design: Six electronic databases were searched from their inception until July 2003. The inclusion criteria were that they were prospective, randomized controlled trials, involved healthy pregnant women at term, and contained outcome measures of labor pain. Results: Our search strategy found 18 trials. Six of these did not meet our inclusion criteria. The remaining 12 trials involved acupuncture (2), biofeedback (1), hypnosis (2), intracutaneous sterile water injections (4), massage (2), and respiratory autogenic training (1). Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence for the efficacy of any of the complementary and alternative therapies for labor pain, with the exception of intracutaneous sterile water injections. For all the other treatments described it is impossible to make any definitive conclusions regarding effectiveness in labor pain control.

Publication Date: 

2004 Jul

OEID: 

6347

Huntley, LA., Coon, TJ., Ernst, E. (2004) 'Complementary and alternative medicine for labor pain: a systematic review', Am J Obstet Gynecol.2004 Jul;191(1):36-44.

Sponsored by 

logo-footer-k.png

Search    Explore    About    Join    Web Policy     Contact Us

Copyright © 2023 OsteoEvidence. All Rights Reserved.
 

bottom of page