top of page
AdobeStock_352149697.jpeg

Effectiveness of manipulative therapy in low back pain: systematic literature reviews and guidelines are inconclusive

Cite

Full Text Link

Sistematic Review

-

Structural and chiropractic

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd.1998 Mar 28;142(13):684-7.

Authors:

W J Assendelft, G J Lankhorst

Abstract.

In the Dutch general practitioners' guidelines spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is not recommended for treatment of acute low back pain. This is in contrast to the recent American and English guidelines, which explicitly recommend SMT for this indication. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on SMT are on average of low methodological quality. Most systematic reviews, however, lead to positive conclusions. The potential sources of discrepancy between the recommendations in the national guidelines are: interpretation of the available RCTs and systematic reviews, composition of the guideline-setting committee, values of the participants and appreciation of direct and indirect costs. Definite conclusions on the efficacy of SMT for (acute) low back pain cannot yet be drawn. Therefore, more RCTs in various settings and on different indications are clearly needed.

Publication Date: 

1998 Mar

OEID: 

4337

Assendelft, JW., Lankhorst, JG. (1998) 'Effectiveness of manipulative therapy in low back pain: systematic literature reviews and guidelines are inconclusive', Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd.1998 Mar 28;142(13):684-7.

Sponsored by 

logo-footer-k.png

Search    Explore    About    Join    Web Policy     Contact Us

​

Copyright © 2023 OsteoEvidence. All Rights Reserved.
 

bottom of page