top of page
AdobeStock_352149697.jpeg

Physiological responses to spinal manipulation therapy: investigation of the relationship between electromyographic responses and peak force

Cite

Full Text Link

Review

-

Structural and chiropractic

J Manipulative Physiol Ther.2013 Nov-Dec;36(9):557-63.

Authors:

F Nougarou, C Dugas, C Deslauriers, I Pagé, M Descarreaux

Abstract.

Objective: It is believed that systematic modulation of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) parameters should yield varying levels of physiological responses and eventually a range of clinical responses. However, investigation of SMT dose-physiological response relationship is recent and has mostly been conducted using animal or cadaveric models. The main objective of the present study is to investigate SMT dose-physiological response relation in humans by determining how different levels of force can modify electromyographic (EMG) responses to spinal manipulation. Methods: Twenty-six participants were subjected to 2 trials of 4 different SMT force-time profiles using a servo-controlled linear actuator motor. Normalized EMG activity of paraspinal muscles (left and right muscles at level T6 and T8) was recorded during and after SMT, and EMG values were compared across the varying levels of force. Results: Increasing the level of force yielded an increase in paraspinal muscle EMG activity during the thrust phase of SMT but also in the two 250-millisecond time windows after the spinal manipulation impulse. These muscle activations quickly attenuated (500 milliseconds after spinal manipulation impulse). Conclusion: The study confirmed the presence of a local paraspinal EMG response after SMT and highlighted the linear relationship between the SMT peak force and paraspinal muscle activation.

Publication Date: 

2013 Nov-Dec

OEID: 

5444

Nougarou, F., Dugas, C., Deslauriers, C., Pagé, I., Descarreaux, M. (2013) 'Physiological responses to spinal manipulation therapy: investigation of the relationship between electromyographic responses and peak force', J Manipulative Physiol Ther.2013 Nov-Dec;36(9):557-63.

Sponsored by 

logo-footer-k.png

Search    Explore    About    Join    Web Policy     Contact Us

Copyright © 2023 OsteoEvidence. All Rights Reserved.
 

bottom of page