top of page
AdobeStock_352149697.jpeg

Straight chiropractic philosophy as a barrier to Medicare compliance: a discussion of 5 incongruent issues

Cite

Full Text Link

Review

-

Structural and chiropractic

J Chiropr Humanit.2013 Oct 24;20(1):19-26.

Authors:

D R Seaman, J R Soltys

Abstract.

Objective: The purpose of this commentary is to discuss potential 5 factors within straight chiropractic philosophy and practice that may prevent Medicare compliance. Discussion: The national Medicare Benefit Policy Manual and the Florida Local Coverage Determination were reviewed to identify documentation and conceptual issues regarding chiropractic practice. Five Medicare positions were contrasted with tenets of straight chiropractic philosophy. Based on Medicare's documentation requirements, Medicare defines subluxation and chiropractic practice from the perspective of treating spinal pain and related functional disability. In contrast, traditional straight chiropractic philosophy is not based on the treatment of spinal pain and disability or other symptomatic presentations. In this context, 5 potential areas of conflict are discussed. Conclusion: The Medicare version of chiropractic practice is not consistent with traditional straight chiropractic philosophy, which may play a role in preventing Medicare compliance. The chiropractic profession may need to consider the fashion in which "philosophy" as it relates to technique and practice is presented to students and doctors to facilitate compliance with the documentation requirements of Medicare.

Publication Date: 

2013 Oct

OEID: 

5513

Seaman, RD., Soltys, RJ. (2013) 'Straight chiropractic philosophy as a barrier to Medicare compliance: a discussion of 5 incongruent issues', J Chiropr Humanit.2013 Oct 24;20(1):19-26.

Sponsored by 

logo-footer-k.png

Search    Explore    About    Join    Web Policy     Contact Us

Copyright © 2023 OsteoEvidence. All Rights Reserved.
 

bottom of page