![AdobeStock_352149697.jpeg](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8f2f36_6d5182ba415f4f0aae30dbd2c5d33b2e~mv2.jpeg/v1/crop/x_2639,y_1556,w_980,h_1107,q_85,blur_2,enc_auto/8f2f36_6d5182ba415f4f0aae30dbd2c5d33b2e~mv2.jpeg)
The efficacy of manual therapy and exercise for different stages of non-specific low back pain: an update of systematic reviews
Sistematic Review
-
Structural and chiropractic
J Man Manip Ther.2014 May;22(2):59-74.
Authors:
B Hidalgo, C Detrembleur, T Hall, P Mahaudens, H Nielens
Abstract.
Objective: to review and update the evidence for different forms of manual therapy (MT) for patients with different stages of non-specific low back pain (LBP). Data sources: MEDLINE, Cochrane-Register-of-Controlled-Trials, PEDro, EMBASE. Method: A systematic review of MT with a literature search covering the period of January 2000 to April 2013 was conducted by two independent reviewers according to Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. A total of 360 studies were evaluated using qualitative criteria. Two stages of LBP were categorized; combined acute-subacute and chronic. Further sub-classification was made according to MT intervention: MT1 (manipulation); MT2 (mobilization and soft-tissue-techniques); and MT3 (MT1 combined with MT2). In each sub-category, MT could be combined or not with exercise or usual medical care (UMC). Consequently, quantitative evaluation criteria were applied to 56 eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and hence 23 low-risk of bias RCTs were identified for review. Only studies providing new updated information (11/23 RCTs) are presented here. Results: Acute-subacute LBP: STRONG-evidence in favour of MT1 when compared to sham for pain, function and health improvements in the short-term (1-3 months). MODERATE-evidence to support MT1 and MT3 combined with UMC in comparison to UMC alone for pain, function and health improvements in the short-term. Chronic LBP: MODERATE to STRONG-evidence in favour of MT1 in comparison to sham for pain, function and overall-health in the short-term. MODERATE-evidence in favour of MT3 combined with exercise or UMC in comparison to exercise and back-school was established for pain, function and quality-of-life in the short and long-term. LIMITED-evidence in favour of MT2 combined with exercise and UMC in comparison to UMC alone for pain and function from short to long-term. LIMITED-evidence of no effect for MT1 with extension-exercise compared to extension-exercise alone for pain in the short to long-term. Conclusion: This systematic review updates the evidence for MT with exercise or UMC for different stages of LBP and provides recommendations for future studies.
Publication Date:
2014 May
OEID:
5508
Hidalgo, B., Detrembleur, C., Hall, T., Mahaudens, P., Nielens, H. (2014) 'The efficacy of manual therapy and exercise for different stages of non-specific low back pain: an update of systematic reviews', J Man Manip Ther.2014 May;22(2):59-74.
Sponsored by
![logo-footer-k.png](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/b07ece_5a8c25311bad4d38b34282482381c912~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_93,h_67,al_c,q_85,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_3,enc_auto/logo-footer-k.png)
Search Explore About Join Web Policy Contact Us
​
Copyright © 2023 OsteoEvidence. All Rights Reserved.